Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of hierarchical regression analysis

From: Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance

Variables ERB EIB EIP
Step 1 Step 2 Step 1 Step 2 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
   Std. β Std. β Std. β Std. β Std. β Std. β Std. β
Step 1         
  Age − .07 − .04 − .09 − .06 .00 .04 .05
  EdL .08 .07 .05 .03 .31 .11 .15
  Gen − .24** − .21** − .25** − .21** − .26** − .22** − .23**
  FaP − .18 − .10 − .18 − .08 − .19 − .10 − .08
Step 2         
  LOB   .29**   .25*   .32** .37**
  LCB   .15   .26**   .17 .26**
Step 3         .
  LOB*LCBB        .26**
  ∆R 2 .08* .16** .07* .20** .11** .20** .05**
  R 2 .08 .24 0.7 .27 .11 .31 .35
  F 2.95* 7.26** 2.66* 8.79** 4.30** 10.22** 10.89**
  1. The results of variance inflation factor (VIF) did not show any problems of multicollinearity. Predictor variables were centered
  2. *P < 05
  3. **P < 01