Skip to main content

A Systems View Across Time and Space

Table 10 Classification (k-means clustering) of Swedish functional analysis regions according to change in nominal GRP and population between 2010 and 2015

From: Exploring a leading and lagging regions dichotomy: does entrepreneurship and diversity explain it?

Stagnant regions

Lagging regions

Leading regions

No.

Name

No.

Name

No.

Name

No.

Name

2

Kristianstad-Hässleholm

33

Avesta-Hedemora

10

Oskarshamn

1

Malmö-Lund

3

Karlskrona

34

Falun-Borlänge

31

Vansbro

4

Älmhult-Osby

5

Ljungby

35

Mora

40

Härjedalen

8

Växjö

6

Halmstad

36

Gävle

41

Östersund

12

Vimmerby

7

Värnamo

37

Bollnäs-Ovanåker

45

Sollefteå

13

Jönköping

9

Kalmar

38

Hudiksvall

46

Strömsund

15

Göteborg

11

Västervik

39

Ljusdal

47

Åsele

16

Trollhättan-Vänersborg

14

Borås

42

Sundsvall

49

Lycksele

18

Skövde-Skara

17

Lidköping-Götene

43

Kramfors

50

Vilhelmina

19

Linköping-Norrköping

20

Gotland

44

Örnsköldsvik

51

Storuman

22

Eskilstuna

21

Nyköping-Oxelösund

52

Skellefteå

53

Arvidsjaur

23

Stockholm

25

Örebro

54

Arjeplog

58

Jokkmokk

24

Västerås

26

Karlskoga

55

Luleå

59

Gällivare

28

Västlandet

27

Karlstad

56

Haparanda

60

Kiruna

32

Ludvika

29

Torsby

57

Överkalix

  

48

Umeå

30

Malung-Sälen