Skip to main content

Table 7 Sensitivity analysis

From: Modelling the significance of strategic orientation for competitive advantage and economic sustainability: the use of hybrid SEM–neural network analysis

Network CU CO TO NO IO CU CO TO NO IO CA
Factors effecting competitive advantage Factors effecting economic sustainability
1 0.14 0.14 0.18 0.11 0.43 0.18 0.21 0.09 0.16 0.24 0.13
2 0.09 0.14 0.20 0.13 0.45 0.11 0.14 0.08 0.14 0.43 0.11
3 0.13 0.08 0.21 0.19 0.39 0.03 0.12 0.11 0.30 0.26 0.18
4 0.10 0.17 0.28 0.15 0.31 0.11 0.06 0.05 0.22 0.35 0.21
5 0.04 0.04 0.19 0.41 0.32 0.09 0.11 0.02 0.14 0.35 0.30
6 0.05 0.19 0.28 0.05 0.43 0.13 0.09 0.07 0.25 0.14 0.32
7 0.09 0.23 0.11 0.15 0.42 0.20 0.11 0.08 0.12 0.28 0.22
8 0.12 0.17 0.25 0.29 0.18 0.26 0.02 0.07 0.01 0.26 0.39
9 0.10 0.04 0.22 0.26 0.38 0.10 0.13 0.09 0.13 0.27 0.28
10 0.13 0.26 0.13 0.14 0.34 0.17 0.10 0.12 0.04 0.31 0.27
Mean importance 0.10 0.14 0.20 0.19 0.37 0.14 0.11 0.08 0.15 0.29 0.24
  Factors effecting competitive advantage Factors effecting economic sustainability
1 33% 31% 42% 25% 100% 77% 90% 36% 66% 100% 57%
2 19% 31% 45% 30% 100% 24% 31% 17% 33% 100% 26%
3 34% 21% 53% 49% 100% 9% 39% 37% 100% 86% 60%
4 30% 53% 88% 48% 100% 31% 16% 15% 62% 100% 61%
5 9% 11% 46% 100% 78% 25% 30% 5% 39% 100% 85%
6 12% 44% 66% 11% 100% 41% 30% 24% 78% 44% 100%
7 22% 54% 25% 36% 100% 70% 38% 28% 43% 100% 79%
8 42% 59% 88% 100% 61% 65% 6% 17% 3% 66% 100%
9 25% 10% 59% 70% 100% 36% 48% 31% 47% 95% 100%
10 39% 76% 39% 39% 100% 54% 34% 38% 13% 100% 88%
Relative importance 26% 39% 55% 51% 94% 43% 36% 25% 48% 89% 76%
  1. CU customer orientation, CO competitor orientation, TO technology orientation, NO network orientation, IO innovation orientation, CA competitive advantage, ES economic sustainability
  2. Source: author’s data analysis