Design thinking teams and team innovation performance

Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship

A Systems View Across Time and Space

Table 3 Measures of team behaviors

Team behaviors			A-groups (M)	B-groups (M)	C-groups (M)	Significant differences
Accept	D2_1	Round 1	3.30	3.36	3.65	C1 > B1 (); C1 > A1(); C2/B2 > A2 (*); C1 > C2()
	D2_2	Round 2	3.34	3.42	3.49
Nurture	N1_1	Round 1	3.23	3.08	3.38	B1 < C1 (); A1 < C1 ()
	N1_2	Round 2	3.23	3.19	3.31
Creativity	N2_1	Round 1	0.43	0.40	0.25	A1/B1 > C1 (!); B2 > B1 (*); C2 > C1 ()
	N2_2	Round 2	0.51	0.71	0.45
Critique	O1_1	Round 1	0.70	0.56	0.36	A1 > B1 (); A1 > C1 (); B1 > C1 (*); B2/A2 > C2(); A1 < A2 (); B1 < B2 (); C1 < C2 (**)
	O1_2	Round 2	0.84	1.04	0.62
Selfpromotion	O2_1	Round 1	1.21	1.10	1.00	A1/B1 > C1 (); A2 > C2 (); B2 > C2 (); B2 > B1 (*)
	O2_2	Round 2	1.21	1.45	0.96
Control	C1_1	Round 1	1.61	1.45	1.26	A1 > B1 (!); A1 > C1 (); B1 > C1 (); A2/B2 > C2 (); A2 > C2 (); A1 < A2 (); B1 < B2 (); C1 < C2 (*)
	C1_2	Round 2	1.84	1.75	1.47
Task orientation	C2_1	Round 1	2.80	2.77	2.58	A1/B1 > C1 (); A1 > C1 ()
	C2_2	Round 2	2.81	2.86	2.62
Loyalty	D1_1	Round 1	3.22	3.11	3.34	C1 > C2 (**)
	D1_2	Round 2	3.15	3.11	3.15

^** Significance at the 0.01 level; * Significance at the 0.05 level; ! Significance at the 0.1 level
A1 = A round 1 (n (ratings) = 350); A2 = A round 2 (n = 343); B1 = B round 1 (n = 415); B2 = B round 2 (n = 415); C1 = C round 1 (n = 151); C2 = C round 2 (n = 151)