A Systems View Across Time and Space
Current study | Authors, methods used, and findings of related published studies | ||
---|---|---|---|
Themes | Authors and year | Methods used in published studies | Findings of the studies |
T-1 | • Amir et al. (2020) • Battisti et al. (2022) • Dong et al. (2020) • Plakhotnik et al. (2021) | • Online survey data were analyzed using descriptive study, logistic regression analysis and Cronbach’s alpha for reliability test • Online survey data were analyzed using Friedman’s ANOVAs, Post hoc using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Cohens' applied to measure effect size • Online survey data were analyzed using descriptive study (mean and standard deviation) • Survey data were analyzed using descriptive study; a Chi-square test was conducted | • Majorities of the students preferred blended learning with distance and face-to-face learning, and first-year students react differently than senior students • The girls perceived more stress from online lessons and use of devices than boys of special educational needs students • Parents think that virtual interaction between teachers and students, or other related parties helps maintain social distancing • University community and instructors play a significant role in building the relationship between the impact of COVID-19 and students’ program completion, job prospects and well-being |
T-2 | • Plakhotnik et al. (2021) • Wang et al. (2020); Kohls et al. (2020) • Lee et al. (2021) • Leal et al. (2021) • Bashir et al. (2021) | • Survey data were analyzed using descriptive study; Chi-square test was conducted • Survey data were analyzed using descriptive study (mean and SD), t-test and Pearson’s correlation analysis. Data were collected from an online cross-sectional study and analyzed using ANOVA and asymptotic Kruskal–Wallis H-test • Written survey responses and interview transcripts were used to collect data and were analyzed using a double-coded phenomenological analysis • Conducted online survey and use a non-probability sampling and analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics • Data were collected by online survey with open and closed questions and analyzed the postcode data using Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework (TEF) metrics; Participation of Local Areas (POLAR) and Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) | • Students’ mental health and well-being significantly impact their engagement in learning activities and course completion • The COVID-19 disruption significantly increased students’ levels of anxiety, depression, and drug and alcohol consumption, which decreased their well-being • The frequency and severity of domestic violence due to COVID-19 closures impacted students’ physical health, which negatively influenced Indigenous and other marginalized students in Canada • The COVID-19 pandemic reduces social interaction and communication, inversely affecting students' learning and university staff • A hybrid delivery that students’ learning from home, and lockdown affect their mental well-being and quality of life |
T-3 | • Saleem et al. (2022) • Rusli et al. (2020) • Youngmann and Kushnirovich (2021) • Indspire (2021) | • Data were analyzed using PROCESS Macro and Stepwise linear regression • Online survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics • The national representative survey data were analyzed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) • Survey was analyzed using descriptive study (mean and standard deviation | • Motivational factors, instructors’ support, and university support predict the quality of online learning • Students use desktop PC, laptops, smartphones and a combination of smartphones and laptops with the internet • The ethnic minorities' insufficient resources during COVID-19 give a higher level of stress, affecting their emotional well-being than the majority populations • Indigenous post-secondary students’ infrastructural challenges, including Internet access or space, lead to their mental and emotional negatively impacting their learning during the COVID-19 pandemic |
T-4 | • Pham et al. (2021) • Baxter and Hainey (2023) | • The survey was conducted in the convenience sampling method; Cronbach’s Alpha was used for the reliability test, and the Bayesian Exploratory Factor Analysis (BEFA) was performed • A case study methodology was adopted in this study | • The learner characteristics, perceived usefulness, course design, course materials, ease of use, and instructors’ teaching capacity affect online learning outcomes • University students view remote learning as beneficial for instant feedback and fostering a community learning practice but prefer face-to-face learning |
T-5 | • Laksana’s (2020) • Plakhotnik et al. (2021) • Zhao et al. (2022) | • Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics • Online survey data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and Chi-square test • The survey data were analyzed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) | • The administration of online delivery, including online learning infrastructure, teaching skills, academic interaction, learning support and learning expectations affect online delivery in minimal internet access areas • The university community and instructors play a role in building the relationship between the impact of COVID-19 on students’ degree completion and well-being • A positive correlation between university students’ learning satisfaction and students’ support services such as management, cognitive, and emotional support during COVID-19 |