Table 6 Reflected RRI-AIRR framework in citizens’ perspectives, Sofia action 3.3

Action 3.3: Include gender equality and diversity measures in the Youth Strategy 2027

Gender inequality issues are sometimes overstated

Gender equality: Citizens’ and policymakers’ understanding of the importance of gender balance differs

More attention should be paid to underrepresented social groups like minorities

Inclusiveness: Citizens support a broader view of diversity and equality

Responsiveness: Citizens prioritise policies with stronger focus on disadvantaged members of society

Ethics: Citizens support broader social justice aspects vis-à-vis equality issues

Anticipation: Citizens expect policies to address social justice issues, not create them

Gender equality and equality measures should be included in the policy; however, no quotas should be introduced

Ethics: Citizens are conscious of the consequences of positive discrimination and safeguarding rights

Inclusiveness: Citizens conceive gender equality as ensuring a level playing field for all

It is critical to have assessment mechanisms in place to evaluate a person’s abilities and skills, rather than providing misguided privileges purely based on gender

Reflexivity: Citizens support transparent and fair policies for professional development

Inclusiveness: Citizens do not see meritocracy as opposed to inclusiveness and gender equality

The municipality may consider appointing an officer specialising in equality and diversity management

Reflexivity: Citizens consider professional expertise critical for good governance