Skip to main content

A Systems View Across Time and Space

Table 7 Reflected RRI-AIRR framework in citizens’ perspectives, Sofia action 3.1

From: The RRI Citizen Review Panel: a public engagement method for supporting responsible territorial policymaking

Action

Citizens’ perspectives

Reflected RRI keys and AIRR dimensions

Action 3.1: Strengthen the collaboration with research institutes, businesses and municipal enterprises for innovative entrepreneurship education and youth employment

Education criteria are set low; fields of study are prioritised based on the prospects of earning higher salaries post-graduation vs gaining skills and knowledge

Anticipation: Citizens focus on increasing quality standards

Science education: Citizens emphasise the role of modern science education

The principles of funding for education need to be reconsidered

Transparency: Citizens demand accountability and transparency in funding the education system

University mentoring programmes do not work, they lack efficiency

Responsiveness: Citizens emphasise efficiency and effectiveness in spending public money

The ministry [of education], universities, and above all, the industry, should lead the joint efforts for improving entrepreneurship education

Anticipation: Citizens value a holistic approach to youth employment opportunities

Reflexivity: Citizens clearly identify the responsibilities of different public actors in sectoral policies