A Systems View Across Time and Space
From: Determinants of financial distress: evidence from insurance companies in Ethiopia
Assumptions | One | The error have zero mean (E (Ɛ) = 0) |
Checked by | Adding a constant term (β0) to the model | |
Result | The assumption is not violated | |
Two | Homoscedasticity (variance of the errors term is constant) | |
Checked by | Breusch–Pagan / Cook–Weisberg test for heteroskedasticity | |
Result | Since the P value of test statistic is highly insignificant,, there is no heteroskedasticity problem | |
Three | Multicollinearity | |
Checked by | Variance inflation factor (VIF) | |
Result | The finding revealed the values of variance inflation factor (VIF) on each variables is less than 10 and values 1 / VIF is greater than 0.1 or 10%. As a result multicollinearity is not a serious problem in the model | |
Four | Autocorrelation test | |
Checked by | Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data | |
Result | The P value of test static is highly insignificant. Hence, there is no evidence for the existence of autocorrelation problem in the model | |
Five | Normality test (residuals are normally distributed) | |
Checked by | Shapiro–Wilk | |
Result | P- values of the residual is highly insignificant, the residuals has normal distribution pattern | |
Six | Model specification test | |
Checked by | Ramsey RESET test | |
Result | Prob > F = 0.8723 which is highly greater than 0.05. This shows that the null hypothesis of the model, which says no omitted variable | |
Reason for test | Parameter estimation technique among fixed and random effect model | |
Types of test done | Hausman specification test | |
STATA result | Since the P-values is highly insignificant (> 0.05) the researcher is decided that the random effect model is suitable for this data set |