Factors influencing entrepreneurial intention to initiate new ventures: evidence from university students
Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship volume 12, Article number: 63 (2023)
As worldwide unemployment is an extensive problem with the increasing population every day, job opportunities did not increase with a similar ratio. Unemployment is increasing, affecting developing countries’ economies like Pakistan. This attempt to solve this problem is commonly acknowledged by creating new opportunities and starting new business ventures. Considering this aspect, this study inspects the aspects that create and affect entrepreneurial intention in young entrepreneurs to start entrepreneurial projects. This study explores the effect of self-efficacy, family, institutional, and peer support on entrepreneurial intention. These factors are expected to create entrepreneurial intention in young graduates to start their business ventures. All these factors and the mediating role of knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, ability to take risks, and entrepreneurial innovativeness motivate young entrepreneurs to take startups. For results, a survey method with a questionnaire has been utilized to gather data. The collected data were evaluated through descriptive and inferential statistics. SPSS and SMART-PLS 3.3 were used for the analysis of results. 716 respondents participated in the data collection process. Data have been gathered from the master's students who registered in Pakistan's top business sector universities. The results of this study showed that self-efficacy, peers support, institutional support, and family support positively impact entrepreneurial intention. Additionally, knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, the ability to take risks, and entrepreneurial innovativeness also significantly affect entrepreneurial intention. In this study, all these results have been discussed. This study also discusses various theoretical and practical factors with substantial policy-making significance.
Startups are born every day, yet most of them die at the same pace as well. Entrepreneurship takes part an essential role in the economy of every country (Ferreira et al., 2023). The total percentage of entrepreneurs worldwide is approximately 583 million, but 22.6% of small businesses fail within a year (Khan et al., 2021). In Pakistan, startups have less than a 2% success rate (Shahzad et al., 2021). That is why it attracts more researchers' interest and makes people more self-employed. There are economic problems in developing countries, so technical entrepreneurship teaches the method to reduce most social and economic problems (Liao et al., 2022). Technical entrepreneurship is an idea to relieve the maximum social addition to economic growth in developing nations (Al-Mamary & Alshallaqi, 2022). Entrepreneurs generate jobs, boost innovation, intensify competition, and adapt to shifting market conditions and societal trends (Gujrati et al., 2019). However, it is interesting to note in Pakistan's financial system struggle with entrepreneurial startups, which might be in the main non-technical, like small and medium entrepreneurship, where people are less inventive in becoming an entrepreneur (Farhangmehr et al., 2016). There is a method to expand the interest in people, and this study involves managing the self-employed and starting their own businesses that also play a role in a stable country’s economy. Russia, Brazil, China, India, South Africa, and Pakistan have the lowest attractiveness for entrepreneurship and low career option (Pradana et al., 2020). According to the National Commission Labor of Pakistan (NCLP) (2002), emphasis on the probability of education and training highlights entrepreneurship development that leads to the creation of more jobs (Lingappa et al., 2020).
Different programs and initiatives also help to approach their career in the right direction (Al-Jubari, 2019). The government of Pakistan also offers different entrepreneurial activities in terms of offering youth loans and different courses to encourage and make skillful entrepreneurs (Liu et al., 2019). The concept of entrepreneurial intention narrates to take entrepreneurial as deliberate and the foundation of an aim to initiate new activities at a pace in establishing a corporation's intentions (Kautonen et al., 2015). After all, observe that entrepreneurship is all about actions rather than trivial ones. Entrepreneurship is becoming a relevant tool to promote any country's financial progress and development (Ferreira et al., 2023). Entrepreneurship helped not only satisfy individual needs but also assist the government in enhancing economic development and growth because of the economic contribution of entrepreneurs (Liu et al., 2019). Once they open new process opportunities, the growth of human beings creates values for society, and they cease to modify the economic growth of a country (Malang, 2019). The development of entrepreneurship inside society plays a very important role. However, most youngsters are still reluctant to move toward entrepreneurship. That is why our study investigated different factors to make people aware of entrepreneurial intention.
Discussing entrepreneurship in Pakistan in 2022 national statistics bureau released information that the success rate of startups locally is remarkably low as it ranges between 10 and 20% (Al-Mamary & Alshallaqi, 2022). Comparing these numbers to nearby Asian countries is a small ratio of successful startups (Wang et al., 2018). Realizing this situation, the government of Pakistan has been enforcing different guidelines and policies to increase people's entrepreneurial intentions (Soomro et al., 2019). Government implements different policies in terms of offering economic incentives for new entrepreneurial projects, giving smooth loans, providing basic training to young entrepreneurs, accomplishing all styles of entrepreneurial improvement programs as well as training to improve their abilities and skills, enhance their knowledge and intention to move their startups (Rachmawan et al., 2015). Different kinds of entrepreneurship projects and programs are provided to older and young people and university students (Farrukh et al., 2017). Nowadays, institutions will show a greater energetic role in boom entrepreneurial intention, especially by imparting their students with education and guidance to make an entrepreneurial profession easier to handle (Palmer et al., 2019). The participation of universities is vital to improve their career road and is becoming an extra commonplace and important choice for students (Shahzad et al., 2021). Based on this, previous studies (Al-Mamary & Alshallaqi, 2022) cleared their students' entrepreneurial aims. Different theories support our study arguments, such as the conservation of resources (COR) theory and the theory of planned behavior (TPB) that improve the knowledge of young people to understand the environment where they start their business ventures (Huang et al., 2022). These theories make them more familiar with the social and psychological atmosphere and people's trust towards entrepreneurial projects.
This proposed study suggests addressing the gap of the earlier studies (Lingappa et al., 2020; Shahzad et al., 2021) by considering the dimensions of entrepreneurship, such as self-efficacy, institutional support, family support, and peer support in the people of Pakistan. With all factors, those people who have entrepreneurial skills, risk-taking ability, and innovative techniques, that lead to the market as new entrepreneurs. This study will find the impact of these different factors with a mediating role on entrepreneurial intention in university graduates. This study aims to recognize the major provocation of all factors which are creating the entrepreneurial intention with the help of mediators; it also enhances the significant correlation between entrepreneurial intention and their factors, which leads university stents to start their projects and improves their entrepreneurial intention. Although without debate, entrepreneurial behavior might be distinct as the detection and assessment and lead toward work opportunities (Liñán et al., 2011). This behavior would be best projected by entrepreneurial intention. All these factors lead to creating an opportunity to understand the entrepreneurial intention. Entrepreneurial intention study is like a technical study to see its context in developing countries (Finch et al., 2016). In different past studies, academies' role was hypothesized on entrepreneurial intention. The entrepreneurial purpose was narrated as the aware country of thoughts that lead up to movement and directs interest in entrepreneurial behaviors, including initiating new enterprises to become successful entrepreneurs (Lingappa et al., 2020).
Importance of entrepreneurial intention in young generations
The element of entrepreneurial intention guides to a grip on entrepreneurial projects, the reason behind pursuing and starting a business that is organized by self-interest. Entrepreneurial intention is important to producing a new journey in the entrepreneurial operation. Many people are already entangled in entrepreneurship ideas that have a clear prospect of enhancing their business journey (Baskaran et al., 2020). According to researchers (Amirkhanpour, 2014) three basic types of measuring people's interests are desire, forecasting, and behavioral intention (Malang, 2019). In business, the entrepreneurial intention is the determination of a new entrepreneur who starts his business with commitment. Entrepreneurial projects can be observable as a primary platform of the entrepreneurial process (Shahzad et al., 2021). In entrepreneurship, past researchers observed that entrepreneurial intention shows a vital role in predicting entrepreneurial projects (Shirokova et al., 2016). A prior study measured different personal and circumstantial variables that directly affect entrepreneurship via Entrepreneurial intention recognized through new startups (Wang et al., 2010). When individuals get hold of entrepreneurial startups, they will be more attracted to this profession's desire and higher effort towards goals (Fayolle & Liñán, 2014). In a country like Pakistan, entrepreneurship is important to create intention in young people, especially university students. However, Pakistan’s economic structure is inappropriately lacking in such business ventures and projects (Azhar et al., 2014). It is far vital that in conjunction with enhancing entrepreneurial intention with the role of government ideology and behavior of people towards startups (Fayolle & Liñán, 2014). Knowledge of entrepreneurial intention is developed strength among business students and young graduate students. These young people are approximate to enter a startup (Palmer et al., 2019).
A previous study used different variables, such as entrepreneurial know-how, expert enchantment, social valuation, and entrepreneurial ability, which are the main determinants of entrepreneurial intention among younger entrepreneurs (Farrukh et al., 2017). These arguments supported our study to start innovative business ideas. The entrepreneurial initiative is key to performing good results in good profits for better results. The entrepreneurial project also introduces high flexibility for increasing revenue. The initiative inspired the owner of a company venture to overcome losses and try to succeed once again (Schlaegel & Koenig, 2014). The key point of this study is how to create and enhance entrepreneurial intention in university graduates, which is why the researcher used different factors to check the relation of entrepreneurial intention with self-efficacy, peer support, family support, and institutional support. Using these factors, the researcher will learn about university student's behaviors, attention, and action toward entrepreneurial projects. In a past study (Kallas, 2019), young entrepreneurs in Pakistan utilized that growing understanding of the extraordinary cultural and historical past, supplying gender-related challenges and opportunities. The researchers (Bose et al., 2007) concluded that amplifying the entrepreneurial base in which government reform to restrict lease-searching, encourage innovation, and foster employment are vital and proposed approaches for new businesses, increase and empowerment of young people to take essential steps towards startups. Prior studies have proposed and empirically investigated the supervision of many determinants of entrepreneurial intention to understand this intention better, using a range of theoretical backgrounds to clarify very easily why certain people who are additional entrepreneurial intention and ideas than others that support our study augments (Schlaegel & Koenig, 2014).
Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention
Self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention
A personality element such as Self-efficacy is deeply observed in the individual and affects different situations. Individual perception also leads to his life through punishment to reward (Yang et al., 2021). Self-efficacy in every character could be exceptional from other entities founded on three dimensions: magnitude, strength, and generality (Malang, 2019). Entrepreneurial intention is the activity or steps towards the entrepreneurial process. High self-efficacy is the energy of self-reliance that belongs to people, which permits them to reach achievement in entrepreneurship roles, challenges, and activities (Omar et al., 2019). In this regard, someone with high self-efficacy can be excessively assured of achieving their desires and goals. The level of self-efficacy can even affect the number of efforts a person will allocate to complete their jobs. People with a sense who can get a good enough education, including different entrepreneurial activities, have resources. They have enough information and excessive confidence to emerge as entrepreneurs (Rachmawan et al., 2015). Self-efficacy is the academic period for believing you can execute a goal and set a target. It is established on people's wisdom of awareness and their competencies and abilities. It displays people's innermost mind on whether they have been challenged to successfully bring out a certain challenge (Arshad et al., 2016).
Self-efficacy that guides motivation to entrepreneurial projects can be explained as a motivation that could inspire an individual to start business projects. They have accomplished a full of life, innovative, revolutionary, and venture to take the risk of wanting to get revenue, either in the form of cash (Siregar & Marwan, 2020). According to previous research (Marques et al., 2019), there is a significant and good-sized correlation between high entrepreneurship efficacies that developed students' interest in starting an entrepreneurial project within destiny. Generally, self-efficacy is a situation in which personalities consider that conduct is simple or tough to evaluate the situation and reach towards goals (Wirtschaft, 2018). According to Arshad et al. (2016), self-efficacy is important in enterprise techniques because efficacy is connected to the career-minded capability of someone to evaluate inner obstacles and possibilities. This self-efficacy also motivated entrepreneurial intention to run startups (Bullough & Renko, 2013). Self-efficacy plays an important role that substantially impacts entrepreneurial passion (Tsai et al., 2016). Entrepreneurial affection also has a wonderful and massive impact on the enterprise's success (Karimi et al., 2014). With increasingly competitive competition in filling existing jobs and an imbalance in job opportunities, graduates must be able and efficacy to create new opportunities to ensure their survival (Siregar & Marwan, 2020).
Family support and entrepreneurial intention
Entrepreneurial intention acknowledges that the family role is crucial to attracting their child to start the business. Specifically, it emphasized that the parents play vibrant roles in the belief that undertaking desirability and feasibility are treated (Farrukh et al., 2017). Besides, the families supply a suitable environment to become an entrepreneur because it gives the kid an effective and efficient demonstration. The researchers (Kolvereid, 1996) mentioned that family support is a constant source of motivation for an entrepreneur's attitude and entrepreneurial motivation, strengthening the relationship between career versatility. Children of entrepreneurs are acquainted with the one-of-a-kind duties carried out by terms of a leader in their family firm (Xu et al., 2020). This family support contributes to advanced entrepreneurial competencies appropriate for beginning or developing a firm. Independent parents assist their children in continuing a career as an entrepreneur. These parents become mentors for their children (Yang et al., 2021). Role models and mentors affect entrepreneurial intention by changing the attitudes and ideals of their children (Palmer et al., 2019). The family plays an imperative role in entrepreneurial startups due to strong associations between family cognition in commercial enterprises and entrepreneurial project results (Xu et al., 2020). Family support has enabled business owners to involve in projects that can be used to address corporate concerns and lessen the emotive distress imposed by financial problems (Sieger & Minola, 2017). Besides, better tiers of own family aid assist marketers in adjusting to their everyday entrepreneurial dreams associated with financial troubles (Olson et al., 2003).
Family support indicates that family participation can be involved in accessing debt financing in begin-up projects (Bird & Wennberg, 2016). Regarding project development, several studies suggest that family support assists entrepreneurs in enlarging their social networks, together with financial and political networks. There is also proof that family support resources are helpful for expatriates and consecutive entrepreneurship (Shen et al., 2017). Family individuals are directly involved in apprehending business possibilities and opportunities that affect their financial decision to improve planning (Klyver & Terjesen, 2007). University students are given monetary and emotional dependency based on their families and constrained lifestyle studies (Sequeira et al., 2007). When a student considers professional options besides entrepreneurship, it is crucial since it reinforces and generates new ideas (Zellweger et al., 2011). Young students are more pregnant in the organization of entrepreneurs due to insufficient information about the entrepreneurial process, lack of experience, and insufficient financial resources (Lee, 2006). Prior researches endorse that the advantages of family support participation are magnified beneath pathetic institutional authorities (Manolova et al., 2019). Families are a crucial source of new startups. In addition, family support, association, and quotation are critical in overcoming and connecting the voids in the prison machine (Hall et al., 2001). Family monetary and social capital can be used for entrepreneurial projects by supplying resources and facilitating transactions (Manolova et al., 2019).
Peer's support and entrepreneurial intention
Peers, which affect the social influence in preference to institutions, are acknowledged to greatly influence a student's alteration to business (Markussen & Røed, 2017). Peers effect is more potent spatially near university peers. Among the place of business colleagues, peers not most effective encouraged entrepreneurial intention undoubtedly but also changed into the most powerful for employees with little earlier publicity of entrepreneurship (Field et al., 2014). The past study examined the premise that peers could have more effect on the students, leading to interaction in entrepreneurial behavior (Lingappa et al., 2020). Organizational principles designate by the founding for an unbiased journey that reflects an undertaking with a high outcome. University peers have more decision power to adjust as an entrepreneur. When squeezed to accept entrepreneurial conduct will grow with the wide variety of university colleagues and peers who have already transformed into entrepreneurs (Kacperczyk, 2013). In past studies, peers affect the individual character with an extended and wealthy history within the social sciences (Markussen & Røed, 2017). For instance, a substantial amount of literature has affected neighborhoods, which led to profound results that community peers could have on people (Bellò et al., 2018). However, it has been dedicated to the position that peers in the place of business might play in impacting personnel profession choices and decisions of access to entrepreneurship (Moog et al., 2015). According to Falck et al., (2012), peers support always affects young people and produces entrepreneurial intention, such as startups are given to people in various capabilities. Our study highlights individual’s peers and their access and association with startups.
Entrepreneurial activities have been increasing returns based on the premise that peer influence is simply a gift within corporations (Field et al., 2016). In a past study (Nanda, 2006), the researchers tried out the affiliation among individual peers and their tendency to grow to become a young entrepreneurs, which is essential to create intention in people. Peer strain can be a highly influential factor in the achievement or failure of individuals in business startups. Peers have huge traits that might impact a man or woman’s attitudes and decisions (Kacperczyk, 2013). In entrepreneurship, peer influence positively impacts the decision to start entrepreneurial projects. According to Nanda and Sørensen (2010), individuals worked with teammates concerned with startups, discussed with peers, and got support. Peers affect personality characteristics or elements of someone's existence, and with their education, peer strain can affect any element of a person's existence, including their education (Falck et al., 2012). However, peer talents, experience, and skills developed through interaction with successful entrepreneurs must be used to identify more personal entrepreneurial aspirations. Peers also support the steps necessary to launch new business endeavors (Moog et al., 2015).
Institutional support and entrepreneurial intention
Institutional support is very vital in entrepreneurial intention. Institutional support boosts individuals to become entrepreneurs, spreading entrepreneurial recognition (Shahzad et al., 2021). The past study discussed institutional support showing significant impact, which leads to determining new strategies for entrepreneurs and financial, and economic development (Basu & Virick, 2008). Through enterprise education and knowledge, initiatives focus on participants who have already participated in entrepreneurial projects and recognized an opportunity (Mustafa et al., 2016). The intent of a businessperson is observed to stay a certain forecaster of real entrepreneurial affiancing (Engle et al., 2011). In Pakistani graduates connecting with courses of entrepreneurship included in their syllabus, they have more desire to become entrepreneurs than other graduates (Yusoff et al., 2016). Institutional support in the entrepreneurial intention where entrepreneurship workshops and seminars are offered to grip on entrepreneurship techniques (Aloulou, 2016). In a previous study (Peterman & Kennedy, 2003), entrepreneurship education is a standard and significant role in university education. Institutional support substantially determines university students' entrepreneurial goals (Fayolle & Liñán, 2014). With educational support, educational institutions added to assist the entrepreneurial intention of young students through developing surroundings that is beneficial for entrepreneurship (Coduras et al., 2008). A previous study established that such institutional supportive environments might also provide students the self-assurance to provoke their commercial enterprise challenge (Zhang et al., 2014).
According to Kraaijenbrink et al. (2010), the survival of a helpful environment is not to educate the circumstance to elevate young entrepreneurs to keep up their entrepreneurial intention. However, it is essential to measure the volume to what extent affects students to move toward business setups (Turker & Selcuk, 2009). Institutional support usually refers to the financial or economic environment of industry and business comprising government and other authorities taking the decisions and operations that affect business (Audretsch et al., 2014; Guerrero & Urbano, 2014). A young entrepreneur who wishes to start a business unit or with his friends is meant to know the numerous institutions that guide new projects (Mustafa et al., 2016). Institutional support has assessed the effect of enterprise education on business activities (Trivedi, 2016). Furthermore, institutional support and entrepreneurship training must be extended to optimistic knowledge and self-experiential techniques (Peterman & Kennedy, 2003). Institutional support refers to people's interest in the business arrangement and influences assets to establish new institutions or renovate present ones (Solesvik, 2013). This study estimates how institutional support people develop entrepreneurial intention among individuals and motives to start their entrepreneurial projects and take them as a profession. Based on all these arguments, we investigate the role of institutional support and other factors, such as self-efficacy, peers, and family support, on entrepreneurial intention. Therefore, we suggest the hypothesis:
There is a positive impact of self-efficacy, family support, peer support, and institutional support on entrepreneurial intention.
Mediating role of knowledge of entrepreneurial skills
Knowledge of entrepreneurial skills are abilities you need to succeed in entrepreneurship. The knowledge of entrepreneurial skills is a crucial determinant of a chance of recognition for entrepreneurs in uncertain environments (Shabbir et al., 2017). A previous study (Faherty, 2015) linked knowledge of entrepreneurial skills with entrepreneurial intention in young students. Entrepreneurial skills are more appropriate for entrepreneurial intention. Entrepreneurial success is set up that largely relies upon entrepreneurial skills instead of experience or schooling (Asad, 2016). In addition, the rugged nature of present day surroundings and the validity of any entrepreneur reclines their entrepreneurial skills that lead to acceptance and response to obscurity and insecurity (Hahn et al., 2020). Knowledge of entrepreneurial skills could be expressed in step with the conceptualization of these skills, which includes skills to avail opportunities. The talent to develop vast social networks collect economic resources, and high competition respond effectively (Johnen, 2017). Knowledge of entrepreneurial skills is a crucial contributing factor to recognition or value creation (Kucel & Vilalta-Buff, 2018). Past researchers (Liñán, 2008) have described positive consequences between positive knowledge of entrepreneurial skills and entrepreneurial intention in the young generation. It is also established from a previous study that entrepreneurial achievement largely relies upon entrepreneurial skills in preference to experience or education in young people (Olutuase et al., 2020). In Pakistan, the effects of entrepreneurship programs and plans are not predicted to influence their youth unemployment and financial contribution. That is why the role of entrepreneurial skills enhances the ability to earn (Seuneke et al., 2013).
According to the researcher (Pyysiainen et al., 2006), interpersonal skills and abilities have contributed to individual life to pursue a career in the right direction. Knowledge of entrepreneurial skills is related to discovering consumer desires (Entrialgo, 2017). Therefore, the important techniques for skills are exploitation and documentation of new business success (Lumpkin et al., 2011). A university education also polishes an individual's innovative competencies and creative skills, leading to a better diploma of entrepreneurial intention (Loué & Baronet, 2012). Past research (Journal et al., 2014) defined that the subjective norm supported by the environment and circle of relatives led to high-quality association among entrepreneurial intention (Michelacci, 2003). In a previous study, entrepreneurial skills knowledge still falls overdue compared to other entrepreneurial knowledge (Chatterjee & Das, 2016). Therefore, it is a need for higher know-how of those constructs of high-quality importance, particularly in a growing economic system like Pakistan. That is why this study pays attention to the role of KES in enhancing the relationship among factors that influence entrepreneurial intentions. Another attempt to offer a particular extra rationalization for the effect of critical and knowledge of entrepreneurial skills towards EI (Collins et al., 2004). Therefore, covering all these aspects, this study investigated the mediating role of knowledge of entrepreneurial skills with the help of factors of EI such as self-efficacy, family support, peer support, and institutional support to enhance the relationship with entrepreneurial intention. Through the above discussion, we have proposed the hypothesis:
Knowledge of entrepreneurial skills positively mediates the relationship between family support, peer and institutional support, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention.
Mediating role of ability to take risk
The risk-taking ability is the characteristics of entrepreneurs and is considered important for the selection or decision to enter entrepreneurship (Sharaf et al., 2018). There are four elements of an entrepreneur’s achievement: a want for achievement, past reports, locus of control, and confidence in self-belief (Al-Mamary & Alshallaqi, 2022). Freedom is connected with entrepreneurs when they make decisions that lead to entrepreneurial intention and awareness (Zainon et al., 2020). Risk-taking ability improves confidence which can guide their propensity to make decisions. It enhances the entrepreneurial intention and activities treasured in innovative intellectual and thoughts near high-risk decisions toward entrepreneurial achievement (Butt et al., 2015). Entrepreneurs are extra self-assured than other people like non-entrepreneurs since they are more willing to take risks to succeed (Yurtkoru & Seray, 2014). A prior study (Rauch et al., 2018) investigated gender variations in the willingness to take the entrepreneurial risk, indicating that young entrepreneurs are extra danger-averse than experienced people. Past studies (Castillo & Freer, 2018) enabled us to identify the risk-taking ability of youngsters in the direction of business success. In addition, previous studies explained how risk-taking abilities successfully enhance young people's confidence to start projects (Lozano-Serrano et al., 2013). Furthermore, a study (Ventura & Quero, 2013) observed that positive attitudes play a beneficial role in unstable entrepreneurship projects that also test the young entrepreneur's temperament.
According to Butt et al. (2015), young entrepreneurs are believed to take risks and understand the number of hazards in business activities. However, the researchers (Robinson & Marino, 2013) accepted that their capability to negotiate while selecting and making decisions could influence the extra extent of self-assurance. Another study (Boyko et al., 2018) observed that assured experiences and different business projects benefit innovative thinking of new ideas towards highly risky situations, leading to entrepreneurial success. Researchers (Ferreiro and Carmen et al., 2013) explained businesspersons have extra self-possession than others, as they are willing to take more risks for achievement. Thus, the above discussion of our study explains easily projects and abilities of a risk-taking character will represent an entrepreneur’s popularity, either low, high, or mild, contributing to the entrepreneur’s achievement in startups. Risk propensity is crucial in entrepreneurial intention to begin new projects (Zainon et al., 2020). Successful entrepreneurs entail taking risks; if they do not include those characteristics, it means reconsidering being a business proprietor project (Palma et al., 2014). Taking entrepreneurship risks includes cautious planning and hard painting in startups (Zainon et al., 2020). The current study stated the mediating role of the ability to take a risk also enhances entrepreneurial intentions among young generations. Students with self-efficacy, family support, peer support, and institutional support can also take the risk that connection to the business's success. Thus, it hypothesized that:
The ability to take risks positively mediates the relationship among self-efficacy, peer support, institutional support, family support, and entrepreneurial intention.
Mediating role of entrepreneurial innovativeness
Entrepreneurial innovativeness is expressed to innovate services and products and discover new methods of manufacturing goods and services. Innovation could be useful for entrepreneurship and business production (Ng et al., 2019). Prior study innovation (Haider et al., 2017) looked at the impact and overall performance of the business strategy in the organization. Entrepreneurial innovativeness is especially increased openness to work on new thoughts and existing ideas using new technology and intention (Domi et al., 2020). Our study highlights the customer-focused business's attempts to innovate new products and services, which will surely impact people's businesses. The achievement of entrepreneurial projects builds upon the volume they attempt to transfer to open innovation (Kyrgidou & Spyropoulou, 2013). Accepting the innovation strategy appears helpful for social businesses to advance and grow their business operations (Ebrahimi et al., n.d.). Entrepreneurial innovativeness mentions a company's ability to utilize opportunities (Covin & Wales, 2012). Entrepreneurial innovativeness is essential in entrepreneurship in a relatively competitive world that stays with innovativeness, and progressive ideas will separate you from the rest (Ndubisi & Iftikhar, 2012). We must adopt innovativeness to produce a super product and build our patron network (Domi et al., 2020). Previous studies (Amirkhanpour, 2014) described the interactions between innovativeness and organization strategies. There is still confusion about which strategic selections, such as research and development expansion, bring greater performance and innovation to a revolutionary business enterprise (Naldi et al., 2007). Therefore, our study's primary goal is to decorate the overall performance using entrepreneurial intention.
The government provided the policy schedule to people with entrepreneurial improvement and endowments with the assessment of their projects. They developed the right direction for people using technology and techniques in the entrepreneur sector (Lee et al., 2010). In fact, Ng and Kee (2017) emphasized the need for entrepreneurship intention for individuals to innovate technological changes that help them to continue their entrepreneurial projects. Entrepreneurial intention and entrepreneurial innovativeness are essential abilities that could have a wonderful effect on the presentation of the new business (Madanoglu et al., 2016). In a past study, the researchers (Lozano-Serrano et al., 2013) had proven that entrepreneurial intention in a young entrepreneur is more innovative with new technology. That is why from the above discussion, our study focuses on entrepreneurial innovativeness. However, entrepreneurial projects are not always clear on how to use their abilities (Lu & Beamish, 2001). Usually, entrepreneurial intention is considered because of the mixture of innovative ideas and hazard-taking awareness (Aloulou & Fayolle, 2005). Arguments elevated confusion in a previous study (Hafeez et al., 2018) that stated innovativeness is the outcome of perception and risk-taking. Therefore, the present study pays attention to innovation's role in creating entrepreneurial intention among students who enrolled in universities. Innovativeness is associated with the tendency to accept newness, and it enhances the competitiveness of the business and leads it to gain advanced overall performance of your business activities (Mueller & Thomas, 2001). Innovativeness is considered a core fee-developing capability that leads the relationship between factors of entrepreneurial intention such as self-efficacy, family support, peer support, and institutional support. That is why we suggest the hypothesis:
Entrepreneurial innovativeness positively mediates the relationship between self-efficacy, family support, institutional support, peer support, and entrepreneurial intentions.
Model of proposed research study
This study has focused on different entrepreneurship factors that create motivation and intention among the youngster to start their businesses and contribute to the country's economy. There are different economic problems globally, especially in a country like Pakistan that lacks job opportunities. The current study makes it easy to move people to start their own ventures and creates more opportunities. This projected study combined two factors to present the considered model. Firstly, the current study investigates the direct relationship between different factors of entrepreneurship, such as self-efficacy, family support, peer support, institutional support, and entrepreneurial intention. Secondly, knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, ability to take risks, and entrepreneurial innovativeness mediate the relationship between interdependent variables such as self-efficacy, family support, peer support, institutional support, and dependent variables, entrepreneurial intention.
Figure 1 represents a research framework in-depth as in literature review as already introduced above to clarify the model shown below.
Material and methods
The objective of the current study is to select entrepreneurship sectors to reduce unemployment, which has an adverse effect on the nation's economy. In this study, we investigated the entrepreneurial intentions of recent graduates motivated to start their businesses. We concentrated on the factors like self-efficacy, family support, peer support, and institutional support that are essential in improving entrepreneurial intention among youngsters. Entrepreneurship is a key driver of job creation in developing economies like Pakistan, which is experiencing a financial crisis. All these aspects motivate young generations to increase opportunities and create a friendly atmosphere for entrepreneurs to probe their contribution to the country's economy. Startups have a vital role in entrepreneurship sectors that produce the environment and rises opportunities for individuals, reviving economic development. The Pakistani government recently focused on improving the business environment for young people to initiate new business ventures in the country. Pakistan presently has the most important ratio of young entrepreneurs. The Pakistani administration has concentrated on improving the country's business environment to address unemployment (Shahzad et al., 2021). Covering this aspect, this study selects the young generations, such as university students with a master's degree in management, including demographic profiles such as gender, age, education, and working experience in the entrepreneurship sector. During the data collection, the participants ensured that the information they collected did not share with any authority. They have collected all information used for this study.
Collection of data from university students was completed through an online survey. The questionnaire was distributed to the students, and data were gathered through online platforms. The data were gathered from 716 master-level students who enrolled in a business degree program in the field of management sciences. The top six universities from the HEC website were selected for data collection purposes in the public and private sectors. The collection of data process was held in the last quarter of 2022. They were located in the capital city of Pakistan (Islamabad). Demographic details include gender, age, education, training courses, and income of university students. University students were selected as respondents the reason behind these students have a management background and also have information about entrepreneurship and skills to start new ventures. Out of 716 respondents, 453 were male, and 263 were female; their percentages were 63% and 37%. Three categories of age were added,160 respondents were in the first category, which is 20–25 years, with 23%, 433 respondents were from the second category with 60%, and 123 respondents were from the third category with 17%. Qualification of respondents which, 151 were bachelor qualified with 21%. The majority of 553 respondents belong to post-graduation and their percentage was 77%. 12% of respondents were from Ph.D. with 2%. The occupation composition of the sample was included in determining the number of students who had taken technical courses and were educated about the market. 321 respondents had no training course and their percentage was 45%. 287 respondents had training courses of less than 6 months; their percentage is 40%. 108 respondents had training courses for more than 6 months, and their percentage was 15%. Monthly family income was categorized as 401 respondents had below 1 lac, and their percentage was 56%. 196 respondents had an income of 1 lac to 10 lac, and their percentage was 27%. 119 respondents had income greater than 10 lac, and their percentage was 17% (Table 1).
Knowledge of entrepreneurial intentions has developed strength among business students. Entrepreneurial intentions five items were calculated by (Liñán & Chen, 2009). Self-efficacy is the physiological process concerned with the power to make decisions and the patience of behavior. Self-efficacy was assessed by five items adopted from Omar et al., (2019). Peers always assist a founder as a network that belongs in a sense to support startups. Peers support four items calculated by Lingappa et al., (2020). Knowledge of entrepreneurial skills is an essential situation and technique for entrepreneurs to apply in unbalanced environments, the absence of which might avert innovation. Knowledge of entrepreneurial skills was measured with 5 items using the scale (Liñán, 2008). Institutional supports are administrative records processing, area control, worker employees, and information. Institutional support was evaluated by five items adopted from Lingappa et al., (2020). Young entrepreneurs' ability to take risks indicates the potential to tolerate uncertainty. The ability to take was measured with six items by Yurtkoru and Seray (2014). Family support is expressed as small commercial entrepreneurship proprietors relying on a circle of relatives to guide past financing. Family support was evaluated by three items adopted from Lingappa et al. (2020). Entrepreneurial innovativeness is connected with moral and experimental probity shielding new beliefs and techniques. Entrepreneurial innovativeness five items were calculated by Mueller and Thomas (2001).
Data analysis and findings
Composite reliability and measurement loadings
This study uses Smart PLS to examine the measurement model. All responses from respondents were listed in software SPSS and Excel. Smart PLS is used for a measurement model analysis of our study. Initially, composite reliability measures the internal coherence of the scale. Furthermore, composite reliability shows at which level the evaluation of reliable results is free from invalidity (Shahzad et al., 2022). For this purpose, composite reliability, Cronbach's alpha, and average variance extracted (AVE) have been measured. According to Sekaran & Bougie, (2016), Cronbach alpha values represent the data's internal consistency, which means how much this data is consistent and valid in this set. However, the values of Cronbach's alpha are above 0.7, showing excellent consistency and reliability in the given data set (Numally & Bestein 1994: Leung et al., 2001). Another hand composite reliability test has just measured the reliability of construct variables by measuring their outer loading (Hair et al., 2011). It showed the composite reliability value of 0.7 or more for each item is examined as the valid and significant of construct reliability. AVE, the average value extracted should be greater than 0.5, which also shows the reliability of constructs (Fornell & Larcker, 1994). In Table 2, it is shown that in every case, the values lie in the accepted range.
The reliability of every item is observed through the outer loading model. Outer loading determines an item's absolute involvement in its allotted construct. Outer loading values always represent the relationship between the reflective measurement model. Outer loading of all factors should be more than 0.705 (Hair et al., 2011). Multicollinearity is detected in regression analysis through variance inflation factor VIF. Moreover, VIF also detects the relationship among two or more independent constructs where multicollinearity occurs in a multiple linear regression model. It can also be utilized to assess the relationship between variables' strengths and to model the future relationship among variables. The accepted range for VIF is less than ± 5 (Hair et al., 2014).
Table 3 displays the results of discriminant validity. Discriminant validity is like discrimination that can be seen in variables and how much the characteristics of these variables are distinct from each other (Hair et al., 2011). The square root values of the AVE coefficient are diagonally attainable in the correlation matrix (Fornell & Larcker, 1994). These values showed clearly that discrimination is present with each other, ensuring that scale is distinct from other similar concepts. To achieve discriminant validity, the outer loading of the self-construct should be below and high (Irvin et al. 1954, Chin & Wang 2010). The values of discriminant validity are shown as entrepreneurial intentions (0.848), knowledge of entrepreneurial skills (0.830), family support (0.883), institutional support (0.929), self-efficacy (0.845), ability to take risk (0.889), entrepreneurial innovativeness (0.847), peer support (0.803).
R-square values show regression which explains how much change can bring independent variables into the dependent variables. This picture shows that the R-square value for knowledge of entrepreneurial skills is (0.433). It means that knowledge of entrepreneurial skills brought a 43.3% change toward entrepreneurial intention with other constructs such as self-efficacy, family support, peer support, and institutional support. Also, the value of R-square for the ability to take risk is (0.448), so the ability to take risk brought a 44.8% change in constructs. The R-square value for entrepreneurial innovativeness is (0.383). It is clearly determined that entrepreneurial innovativeness 38.3% brought a change toward the entrepreneurial intention. The R-square is known as the coefficient of determination. There are three levels to evaluate R-square. The first one is if the obtained value of the R-square is close to 0.75, then the R-square is substantial. Second, if the value of the R-square is close to 0.50, then the R-square is moderate. Third, the last value of the R-square is close to 0.25; then the R-square is a week (Hair et al., 2014) (Fig. 2).
In this study, path coefficient assessment shows the correlation among all variables of the proposed hypothesis. The significance value (p) should be ≥ 0.05; if, in any case, the p-value is greater than 0.05, then it means the path coefficient does not count as valid or significant (Hair et al., 2014). The values of a direct effect of paths are revealed in the table: β-value, t-statistics, and p-values. The path coefficient and standardized β coefficient in the regression analysis were the same in PLS. Through the β value, every path of the hypothesized model is tested. The greater value of β, the more substantial the effect on endogenous variables. This β value had to be substantiated for significance level through the t-statistics test. The applicability of the hypothesis is evaluated using PLS bootstrapping methods for the path model. The β values showed a dependent construct for one unit variation in independent constructs. The t-statistics threshold value is |t|≥ 1.96, and the threshold value of the significance level is p < 0.05. In table hypothesis testing, it had found that self-efficacy has a positive impact on knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, ability to take risks, and entrepreneurial innovativeness demonstrated by (β = 0.111, 0.134, 0.160); (t = 2.440, 2.748, 3.578) and (p = 0.015, 0.006, 0.000) correspondingly. Family support has a positive impact on knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, ability to take risks, and entrepreneurial innovativeness as evidenced by (β = 0.182, 0.199, 0.140); (t = 4.134, 4.199, 3.014) and (p = 0.000, 0.000, 0.003). Peers support has a positive impact on knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, ability to take risks, and entrepreneurial innovativeness as evidenced by (β = 0.375, 0.208, 0.313); (t = 7.047, 3.727, 5.717) and (p = 0.000, 0.000, 0.000). Institutional support has a significant impact on knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, ability to take risks, and entrepreneurial innovativeness as evidenced by (β = 0.197, 0.345, 0.210); (t = 3.843, 5.726, 3.351) and (p = 0.000, 0.000, 0.001). Knowledge of entrepreneurial skills has a positive impact on entrepreneurial intention, as demonstrated by (β = 0.253), (t = 5.266), and (p = 0.000). The ability to take risks has a positive impact on entrepreneurial intention, as evidenced by (β = 0.068), (t = 2.469), and (p = 0.014). Entrepreneurial innovativeness has a significant impact on entrepreneurial intention, as shown by (β = 0.060), (t = 15.213), and (p = 0.000). The literature study supports these results (Chen & Aklikokou, 2020) (Table 4).
The result of the bootstrapping algorithm in PLS-SEM represented the indirect effect between all constructs. By calculating bootstrapping and the specific indirect effect, the mediation role of constructs was assessed through SmartPLS software (Fornell & Bookstein, 1982). The mediation effect of knowledge of entrepreneurial skills between self-efficacy, family support, peers support, institutional support, and entrepreneurial intention is significant and mediates with gained values (β = 0.028, 0.046, 0.095, 0.050); (t = 1.993, 3.235, 4.179, 3.352) and (p = 0.036, 0.001, 0.000, 0.001). The ability to take risks also mediated the association between self-efficacy, family support, peers support, institutional support, and entrepreneurial intention is significant and mediates with acquired values (β = 0.012, 0.014, 0.013, 0.024); (t = 1.886, 2.067, 1.998, 2.400) and (p = 0.030, 0.039, 0.040, 0.017). The mediation effect of entrepreneurial innovativeness between self-efficacy, family support, peers support, institutional support, and entrepreneurial intention is significant and mediate with obtained values (β = 0.106, 0.093, 0.206, 0.139); (t = 3.313, 2.930, 5.145, 3.496) and (p = 0.001, 0.004, 0.000, 0.001). Results revealed that all constructs mediate the relationship, and the hypothesis is accepted (Table 5).
This study is directed to measure the impact of self-efficacy, family support, peer support, and institutional support on an individual’s entrepreneurial intention with the knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, ability to take risks, and entrepreneurial innovativeness. The data were gathered from 716 students who were aspiring business owners. The questionnaires were divided into a sample of targeted people to take their judgment about startups. The results are deliberated in two major portions: first, results show that self-efficacy, family support, peer support, and institutional support significantly influence entrepreneurial intention. Second, current study findings revealed that all the mediating variables (knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, ability to take risks, and entrepreneurial innovativeness) mediate the affiliation between self-efficacy, family support, peer support, and institutional support towards the individual's entrepreneurial intention. These constructs, supported by earlier literature, foster entrepreneurial intent among young businesspeople for new ventures.
A previous study (Siregar & Marwan, 2020) examined the case of self-efficacy, which motivates someone to begin business ventures and see them through to completion with passion. Self-efficacy, knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, ability to take risks, and entrepreneurial innovativeness have played the role of mediators, which enhance the significant effect on entrepreneurial intention. An important component of family support that significantly contributes to improving entrepreneurial intention. Family support always strengthens entrepreneurial intention and motivation, mediating the relationship between career versatility (Xu et al., 2020). It was also proved from previous studies that family support significantly impacts EI and minimizes startups' failure. The results exhibited a positive correlation between family support and entrepreneurial intention. Our study proved significant relationships between family support and knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, a propensity to take a risk, entrepreneurial innovativeness and entrepreneurial intention.
Since peer support has a greater effect on EI, its purpose has grown over the past few decades. Previous studies established a significant and positive impact of peer support on entrepreneurial intention (Shahzad et al., 2021). According to the researcher Lingappa et al., (2020), the study examined the premise that peers could have more effect on the student; it leads to more interaction in entrepreneurial intention and conduct. The current study positively impacts and enhances peer support’s role in entrepreneurial intention in young university graduates. Knowledge of entrepreneurial skills also significantly enhances entrepreneurial intention with the help of peer support and the ability to take a risk. Entrepreneurial innovativeness also positively and significantly impacts peer and entrepreneurial intention. It is commonly recognized that institutional support also significantly influences individuals' entrepreneurial intentions to start their own business, because IS has determined that students who engage with entrepreneurial courses that are part of their curriculum, entrepreneurship workshops, and seminars are offered to grip entrepreneurship practices. As part of institutional support promotes networking and awareness to increase entrepreneurial intention (Mousa & Othman, 2020). In this study, institutional support significantly impacts entrepreneurial intention. With institutional support, the knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, the ability to take a risk, and entrepreneurial innovativeness also positively impact entrepreneurial intention.
Furthermore, we offer a significant theoretical contribution by combining COR and TPB theory with the entrepreneurial literature. We contend that COR theory has much to contribute in enhancing our comprehension of how entrepreneurs utilize business network ties to accomplish various aims at various stages of their careers. At the same time, COR implies that the beneficial association between social and psychological resources strengthens the entrepreneurial intention of individuals. TPB theory explains people's attitudes and behavior to achieve the objective and decision-making process. Finally, the findings demonstrate that the personal characteristics of potential employees and entrepreneurial intention are crucial components of business success. In instruction to expand a viable advantage in the market, they also highlight the integration of open innovation policies into business models. This encourages an evolving economic system capable of managing technical and industry complexities through innovation strategies, knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, and the ability to take risks under certain circumstances. The results showed that all entrepreneurial intention factors play crucial roles in business success. The degree to which these businesses work to advance open innovation will determine their level of success. These results may aid in establishing policy and offer direction to aspiring entrepreneurs in selecting their professional pathways.
This study guides entrepreneurs who might profit from launching their business ventures and assists them in strengthening their position in Pakistan's growing entrepreneurship market. This study also deliberates on the importance of entrepreneurial intention and how it motivates people to launch new businesses. This study has a beneficial contribution to the entrepreneurship industry, such as the entrepreneurial projects playing a vibrant role in the economy of any country. The current study and research have described the importance of entrepreneurial intention and discussed different factors that positively impact entrepreneurial intention, such as self-efficacy, family support, peer support, and institutional support. Entrepreneurial intention benefits the business sector and improves the performance of existing entrepreneurial projects. This study creates awareness in young entrepreneurs to start their business setups. Through entrepreneurial intention, reduce the unemployment rate. Entrepreneurial intention is very important for any individual to start a new startup in business. Most entrepreneurial startups fail due to poor initiative toward achieving goals. Unemployment is increasing constantly, which affects the job market as the world-wise population increases, but job opportunities are not increased, which also affects the economy. This study creates entrepreneurial intention in young people and other people to take their startups instead of job opportunities. The purpose of the study is described as the aware country of thoughts that succeed movement and direct interest towards entrepreneurial intention, including starting business projects and becoming an entrepreneur.
This study highlights the need to give young graduates the knowledge and abilities they need to launch their firms. Additionally, students will absorb how to overcome obstacles and develop a stronger desire to launch a firm. The entrepreneurship culture fosters the development of knowledge, skills, and creative approaches. Additionally, it aids in overcoming obstacles brought on by the economic crisis. The recommendations provided by this study will be helpful to recent graduates as they attempt to develop successful entrepreneurs and negotiate in the market environment. Finally, it emphasizes the significance of the government and banking institutions in boosting business endeavors nationwide. The government should implement supportive initiatives to promote entrepreneurial activity, provide financial support, and reform the legal background that enables fresh people to start businesses as careers. Additionally, it will positively impact Pakistan's entrepreneurial authorities, motivating them to support recent graduates in enhancing their entrepreneurial skills.
Conclusions and policy recommendations
This study enlightens the role of factors affecting entrepreneurial intention in starting business projects. It has two significant findings: first, a positive impact of self-efficacy, family support, peer support, and institutional support on entrepreneurial intention was inspected. Secondly, a significant mediating role of knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, ability to take risks, and entrepreneurial innovativeness between self-efficacy, family support, peer support, and institutional support on entrepreneurial intention were examined. This study contributed to the field of entrepreneurship, especially in countries like Pakistan, where the joblessness ratio is increasing compared to jobs. This study aims to create intentions in young people to initiate their businesses instead of doing jobs. Through their startups, they are creating opportunities for other people and themselves. This study demonstrates the significance of comprehending the proposed model; different factors and mediating roles are essential to start a new business project. A young entrepreneur with all these abilities should start an entrepreneurial project. These entrepreneurship projects are crucial in the small and medium industries directly influencing a country's economy.
Limitations and future recommendations
This research has some limitations that are essential to discourse to intensify the research scope. Limitation in every research has existed due to various constraints in research methodology due to different factors. First, the limitation is the selection of the sample size. The data were collected only from the field of management students only. To expand the scope of the current study, we can extend it to examine the opinions of additional students from various disciplines of study. Future study is still feasible in this area. Second, this study is cross-sectional; the data were collected once. Therefore, it is recommended that future studies be longitudinal to obtain more appropriate results. Third, in this study, it is investigated that the data through the questionnaire survey have been collected from the students enrolled in business in top universities of Islamabad, Pakistan, by HEC ranking. Therefore, for future studies, researchers should increase the number of universities at the whole Punjab province or Pakistan level. Fourth, Fourth, various factors of entrepreneurial intention were applied in this study. To examine people's entrepreneurial intentions, it is advised to incorporate other variables provided by theories of entrepreneurial performance and empirical research, such as family history, social culture, and self-motivation. It will aid in the study's generalization. Fifth, this study concentrated on entrepreneurial intention, the main element driving a person to establish their own business. Despite our emphasis on entrepreneurial initiatives, we used a variety of elements that had an impact on our understanding of entrepreneurial concepts. Lastly, in this study, we explored the numerous predisposing factors for entrepreneurial ambition in a developing nation like Pakistan; it is advised to conduct a multi-country investigation to simplify the findings for follow-up research.
Data can be obtained upon reasonable request.
Conservation of resources
Higher Education Commission
Theory and theory of planned behavior
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
Knowledge of entrepreneurial skills
Al-Jubari, I. (2019). College students’ entrepreneurial intention: Testing an integrated model of SDT and TPB. SAGE Open, 9(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019853467
Al-Mamary, Y. H., & Alshallaqi, M. (2022). Impact of autonomy, innovativeness, risk-taking, proactiveness, and competitive aggressiveness on students’ intention to start a new venture. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(4), 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100239
Aloulou, W. J. (2016). Predicting entrepreneurial intentions of final year Saudi university business students by applying the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23(4), 1142–1164. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2016-0028
Aloulou, W., & Fayolle, A. (2005). A conceptual approach of entrepreneurial orientation within small business context. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 13(01), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218495805000045
Amirkhanpour M. (2014). The future of entrepreneurship. In Future of Entrepreneurship.
Arshad, M., Farooq, O., Sultana, N., & Farooq, M. (2016). Determinants of individuals’ entrepreneurial intentions: A gender-comparative study. Career Development International, 21(4), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-10-2015-0135
Asad, M. (2016). Mediating effect of entrepreneurial skills on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial intention. 28(2), 1551–1556.
Asad, M., Shabbir, M., Salman, R., Haider, S., & Ahmad, I. (2017). Do entrepreneurial orientation and size of enterprise influence the performance of micro and small enterprises? A study on mediating role of innovation. Management Science Letters, 8(10), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.7.008
Audretsch, D. B., Coad, A. & Segarra, A. (2014). Firm growth and innovation. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 743–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9560-x.
Azhar, A., Javaid, A., Rehman, M., & Hyder, A. (2014). Entrepreneurial intentions among business students in Pakistan. Journal of Law and Governance, 5(2), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.15209/jbsge.v5i2.181
Baskaran, S., Samtharam, S. R., Raman, D. K., & Mahadi, N. (2020). MBA Education: Curriculum to Creation (C2C) of Potential Entrepreneurs. 14(2).
Basu, A., & Virick, M. (2008). Assessing entrepreneurial intentions amongst students: a comparative study. 12th Annual Meeting of the National Collegiate …, 2000, 79–86. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Assessing+Entrepreneurial+Intentions+Amongst+Students+:+A+Comparative+Study+Peer-Reviewed+Papers#0%5Cnhttp://www.nciia.net/conf08/assets/pub/basu2.pdf
Bellò, B., Mattana, V., & Loi, M. (2018). The power of peers: A new look at the impact of creativity, social context and self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intentions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 24(1), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2016-0205
Bestein, N. (1994). The stability of undergraduate students’ cognitive test anxiety levels. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7(20), 2000–2001.
Bird, M., & Wennberg, K. (2016). Why family matters: The impact of family resources on immigrant entrepreneurs’ exit from entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(6), 687–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.09.002
Bose, N., Haque, M. E., & Osborn, D. R. (2007). Public expenditure and economic growth: a disaggregated analysis for developing countries financial structure view project corruption (governance) and development view project public expenditure and economic growth: a disaggregated analysis for developing. Journal Compilation, 75(5), 533.
Bougie, S. (2016). Research-methods-for-business-a-skill-building-approach-1993 uma Sakran’s. 136.
Boyko, E. J., Seelig, A. D., & Ahroni, J. H. (2018). Limb-and person-level risk factors for lower-limb amputation in the prospective Seattle diabetic foot study. Diabetes Care, 41(4), 891–898. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2210
Bullough, A., & Renko, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial resilience during challenging times. Business Horizons, 56(3), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.01.001
Butt, M., Jamil, N., & Nawaz, R. (2015). The mediating role of risk perception among cognitive biases towards decision to start a new venture. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 54(2012), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.54.88
Castillo, M., & Freer, M. (2018). Revealed differences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 145, 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.10.017
Chatterjee, N., & Das, N. (2016). A study on the impact of key entrepreneurial skills on business success of Indian micro-entrepreneurs: A case of Jharkhand Region. Global Business Review, 17(1), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915610729
Chen, L., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2020). Determinants of E-government adoption: Testing the mediating effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(10), 850–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1660989
Chin., Wang. (2010). The interaction of a 9-aminoacridine derivative with nucleic acids and nucleoproteins. In: The Journal of biological chemistry (Vol. 206, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)71293-3.
Coduras, A., Urbano, D., Rojas, Á., & Martínez, S. (2008). The relationship between university support to entrepreneurship with entrepreneurial activity in Spain: A gem data based analysis. International Advances in Economic Research, 14(4), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-008-9173-8
Collins, L., Hannon, P. D., & Smith, A. (2004). Enacting entrepreneurial intent: The gaps between student needs and higher education capability. Education Training, 46, 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910410569579
Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2012). The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 677–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00432.x
Domi, S., Capelleras, J. L., & Musabelliu, B. (2020). Customer orientation and SME performance in Albania: A case study of the mediating role of innovativeness and innovation behavior. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 26(1), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766719867374
Ebrahimi, P., Reza, H., Shirsavar, A., & Forootani, F. (n.d.). Entrepreneurship and SMEs Performance : Studying the Mediating Role of Innovation and the Moderating Role of Firm Size.
Engle, R. L., Schlaegel, C., & Dimitriadi, N. (2011). Institutions and entrepreneurial intent: A cross-country study. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946711001811
Entrialgo, M. (2017). Are the intentions to entrepreneurship of men and women shaped Di昀ferently? The impact of entrepreneurial role-model exposure and entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0013
Faherty, A. (2015). Developing enterprise skills through peer-assessed pitch presentations. Education Training. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2014-0013
Falck, O., Heblich, S., & Luedemann, E. (2012). Identity and entrepreneurship: Do school peers shape entrepreneurial intentions? Small Business Economics, 39(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9292-5
Farhangmehr, M., Gonçalves, P., & Sarmento, M. (2016). Predicting entrepreneurial motivation among university students: The role of entrepreneurship education. Education and Training, 58(7–8), 861–881. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2016-0019
Farrukh, M., Khan, A. A., Shahid Khan, M., Ravan Ramzani, S., & Soladoye, B. S. A. (2017). Entrepreneurial intentions: The role of family factors, personality traits and self-efficacy. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 13(4), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/wjemsd-03-2017-0018
Fayolle, A., & Liñán, F. (2014). The future of research on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 663–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.024
Ferreira, J. M., Fernandes, C. I., & Mota, P. (2023). The role of entrepreneurial ecosystems in the SME internationalization. Journal of Business Research., 157(January), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113603
Field, E., Jayachandran, S., Pande, R., & Rigol, N. (2014). Friends at Work : Can Peer Support Stimulate Female Entrepreneurship? 34.
Field, E., Jayachandran, S., Pande, R., & Rigol, N. (2016). Friendship at work: Can peer effects catalyze female entrepreneurship? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(2), 125–153. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20140215
Finch, D. J., Peacock, M., Levallet, N., Foster, W., Finch, D. J., Peacock, M., Levallet, N., Foster, W., Mcmurray, S., Dutton, M., Mcquaid, R., Richard, A., Ishengoma, E., Vaaland, T. I., & Bell, R. (2016). A dynamic capabilities view of employability: Exploring the drivers of competitive advantage for university graduates. Education Training Article Information., 58(1), 61–81.
Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151718
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1994). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research., 18(3), 382–388.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2014). Academics’ start-up intentions and knowledge filters: An individual perspective of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9526-4
Gujrati, R., Tyagi, V., & Lawan, L. A. (2019). Family Financial Status and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention: the Mediatory Role of Entrepreneurship Education. Journal of Management, 10(3), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.34218/jom.6.3.2019.003
Hafeez, M. H., Basheer, M. F., Rafique, M., & Siddiqui, S. H. (2018). Exploring the links between TQM practices, business innovativeness and firm performance: An emerging market perspective. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 38(2), 485–500.
Hahn, D., Minola, T., Bosio, G., & Cassia, L. (2020). The impact of entrepreneurship education on university students’ entrepreneurial skills: A family embeddedness perspective. Small Business Economics, 55(1), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00143-y
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Hall, A., Melin, L., & Nordqvist, M. (2001). Entrepreneurship as radical change in the family business: Exploring the role of cultural patterns. Family Business Review, 14(3), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00193.x
Huang, S., Zhu, Y., Ding, Z., & Chen, C. (2022). Internationalization speed and international performance among international new ventures: The moderating role of resource synchronization. British Journal of Management, 00, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12697
Irvin, J. L., & Irvin, E. M. (1954). The interaction of a 9-aminoacridine derivative with nucleic acids and. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)71293-3
Johnen, C. (2017). Affect and firm performance : The mediating role of entrepreneurial skills. October, 25.
Journal, I. M., Author, T., Reserved, A. R., & Development, P. (2014). Exploring Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Skills among Student Enterprise at Higher Learning Institution in Malaysia: A Case of Student Enterprise of University Utara Malaysia Armanurah Mohamad 1 , Muhammad Hussin 2 and Nor Aishah Buang 3. 2(2), 37–51.
Kacperczyk, A. J. (2013). Social influence and entrepreneurship: The effect of university peers on entrepreneurial entry. Organization Science, 24(3), 664–683. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0773
Kallas, E. (2019). Environment-readiness entrepreneurship intention model: The case of Estonians and the Russian-speaking minority in Estonia. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018821759
Karimi, S., Biemans, H. J. A., Lans, T., Chizari, M., & Mulder, M. (2014). Effects of role models and gender on students’ entrepreneurial intentions. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(8), 694–727. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-03-2013-0036
Kautonen, T., van Gelderen, M., & Fink, M. (2015). Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(3), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12056
Khan, K. I., Niazi, A., Nasir, A., & Hussain, M. (2021). The effect of COVID-19 on the hospitality industry: The implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity., 7, 30.
Klyver, K., & Terjesen, S. (2007). Entrepreneurial network composition: An analysis across venture development stage and gender. Women in Management Review, 22(8), 682–688. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420710836344
Kolvereid, L. (1996). Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879602100104
Kraaijenbrink, J., Bos, G., & Groen, A. (2010). What do students think of the entrepreneurial support given by their Universities? Jeroen Kraaijenbrink *, Ger Bos and Aard Groen. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 9(1), 2010.
Kucel, A., & Vilalta-Buff, M. (2018). Entrepreneurial skills and wage employment. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2759715
Kyrgidou, L. P., & Spyropoulou, S. (2013). Drivers and performance outcomes of innovativeness: An empirical study. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00803.x
Lee, J. (2006). Impact of family relationships on attitudes of the second generation in family business. Family Business Review, 19(3), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00069.x
Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs-An intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009
Leung, M. Y., Zhang, H., & Skitmore, M. (2008). Effects of organizational supports on the stress of construction estimation participants. Journal of construction Engineering and Management, 134(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2008)134:2(84).
Liao, Y. K., Nguyen, V. H. A., Chi, H. K., & Nguyen, H. H. (2022). Unraveling the direct and indirect effects of entrepreneurial education and mindset on entrepreneurial intention: The moderating role of entrepreneurial passion. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 41(3), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22151
Liñán, F. (2008). Skill and value perceptions: How do they affect entrepreneurial intentions? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0093-0
Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice., 33(3), 593–617.
Liñán, F., Rodríguez-Cohard, J. C., & Rueda-Cantuche, J. M. (2011). Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: A role for education. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-010-0154-z
Lingappa, A. K., Shah, A., & Mathew, A. O. (2020). Academic, family, and peer influence on entrepreneurial intention of engineering students. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020933877
Liu, X., Lin, C., Zhao, G., & Zhao, D. (2019). Research on the effects of entrepreneurial education and entrepreneurial self-efficacy on college students’ entrepreneurial intention. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00869
Loué, C., & Baronet, J. (2012). Toward a new entrepreneurial skills and competencies framework: A qualitative and quantitative study. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 17(4), 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2012.050164
Lozano-Serrano, M., García-Seco, J. A., García-Seco, F., Lozano-Hernández, M. C., Seco-Segura, Á. M., Moreno-Fernández, J., Muñoz-Cazallas, P. A., Ferreiro-Vicario, C., & Sánchez-Covisa, M. A. (2013). Valoración de la satisfación y calidad de vida en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 1 en tratamiento con infusión subcutánea continua de insulina comparado con multidosis de insulina. Enfermeria Clinica, 23(3), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2013.02.004
Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.184
Lumpkin, G. T., Steier, L., & Wright, M. (2011). Family business business and strategic. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 306(November), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej
Madanoglu, M., Altinay, L., & Wang, X. (2016). Disentangling the effect of family involvement on innovativeness and risk taking: The role of decentralization. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1796–1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.058
Malang, T. (2019). The effect of familiy environment, entrepreneurship education and self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intention in pondok pesantren at throughout Malang, Indonesia. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 20(5), 112–119.
Manolova, T. S., Edelman, L. F., Shirokova, G., & Tsukanova, T. (2019). Youth entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Can family support help navigate institutional voids? Journal of East-West Business, 25(4), 363–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2019.1624672
Markussen, S., & Røed, K. (2017). The gender gap in entrepreneurship – The role of peer effects. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 134(201336), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.12.013
Marques, C. S., Marques, C. P., Ferreira, J. J. M., & Ferreira, F. A. F. (2019). Effects of traits, self-motivation and managerial skills on nursing intrapreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(3), 733–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0520-9.
Michelacci, C. (2003). Low returns in R&D due to the lack of entrepreneurial skills. Economic Journal, 113(484), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00095
Moog, P., Werner, A., Houweling, S., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2015). The impact of skills, working time allocation and peer effects on the entrepreneurial intentions of scientists. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(3), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9347-x
Mousa, S. K., & Othman, M. (2020). The impact of green human resource management practices on sustainable performance in healthcare organisations: A conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118595
Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. (2001). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: a nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing., 9026(99), 51–75.
Mustafa, M. J., Hernandez, E., Mahon, C., & Chee, L. K. (2016). Entrepreneurial intentions of university students in an emerging economy: The influence of university support and proactive personality on students’ entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 8(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-10-2015-0058
Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjöberg, K., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 20(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00082.x
Nanda, R. (2006). Peer-Effects and Entrepreneurship. March, 26.
Nanda, R., & Sørensen, J. B. (2010). Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(7), 1116–1126. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1179
Ndubisi, N. O., & Iftikhar, K. (2012). Relationship between entrepreneurship, innovation and performance: Comparing small and medium-size enterprises. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 214–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/14715201211271429
Ng, H. S., & Kee, D. M. H. (2017). Entrepreneurial SMEs surviving in the era of globalisation: Critical success factors. Global Opportunities for Entrepreneurial Growth: Coopetition and Knowledge Dynamics within and across Firms, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-501-620171007
Ng, H. S., Kee, D. M. H., & Ramayah, T. (2019). Examining the mediating role of innovativeness in the link between core competencies and SME performance. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(1), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-12-2018-0379
Olson, P. D., Zuiker, V. S., Danes, S. M., Stafford, K., Heck, R. K. Z., & Duncan, K. A. (2003). The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 639–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00014-4
Olutuase, S. O., Brijlal, P., & Yan, B. (2020). Model for stimulating entrepreneurial skills through entrepreneurship education in an African context. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1786645
Omar, N. A., Ullah Shah, N., Abu Hasan, N., & Ali, M. H. (2019). The influence of self-efficacy, motivation, and independence on students’ entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Nusantara Studies JONUS, 4(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol4iss2pp1-28
Palma, P., Köck-Schulmeyer, M., Alvarenga, P., Ledo, L., Barbosa, I. R., López de Alda, M., & Barceló, D. (2014). Risk assessment of pesticides detected in surface water of the Alqueva reservoir (Guadiana basin, southern of Portugal). Science of the Total Environment, 488–489(1), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.088
Palmer, C., Fasbender, U., Kraus, S., Birkner, S., & Kailer, N. (2019). A chip off the old block? The role of dominance and parental entrepreneurship for entrepreneurial intention. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00342-7
Peterman, N. E., & Kennedy, J. (2003). Enterprise education: Influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 129–144.
Pradana, M., Wardhana, A., Wijayangka, C., Kartawinata, B. R., & Wahyuddin, S. (2020). Indonesian university students’ entrepreneurial intention: A conceptual study. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 571–573. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.101
Pyysiainen, et al. (2006). 기사 (Article) 와 안내문 (Information). The Eletronic Library, 34(1), 1–5.
Rachmawan, A., Lizar, A. A., & Mangundjaya, W. L. (2015). The role of parent’s influence and self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intention. The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(3), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2015.0157
Rauch, M., Wenzel, M., & Wagner, H. T. (2018). The impact of digital innovation on path-dependent decision-making: The mediating role of risk propensity and opportunity-threat perception. ICIS 2017: Transforming Society with Digital Innovation, December.
Robinson, A. T., & Marino, L. D. (2013). Overconfidence and risk perceptions: Do they really matter for venture creation decisions? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(1), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0277-0
Schlaegel, C., & Koenig, M. (2014). Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: A meta-analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(2), 291–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12087
Sequeira, J., Mueller, S. L., McGee, J., & Jeffrey, E. (2007). The influence of social ties and self-efficacy in forming entrepreneurial. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 12(3), 275.
Seuneke, P., Lans, T., & Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2013). Moving beyond entrepreneurial skills: Key factors driving entrepreneurial learning in multifunctional agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.06.001
Shabbir, M. S., Mohd Shariff, M. N., Salman, R., & Shabbir, M. F. (2017). Exploring the link between entrepreneurial skills and entrepreneurial intentions: Proposing a hypothesized model for future. Paradigms, 11(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.24312/paradigms110112
Shahzad, F., Shahzad, M. F., Dilanchiev, A., & Irfan, M. (2022). Modeling the influence of paternalistic leadership and personality characteristics on alienation and organizational culture in the aviation industry of Pakistan: The mediating role of cohesiveness. Sustainability (switzerland), 14(22), 15473. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215473
Shahzad, M. F., Khan, K. I., Saleem, S., & Rashid, T. (2021). What factors affect the entrepreneurial intention to start-ups ? The role of entrepreneurial skills, propensity to take risks, and innovativeness in open business models. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity., 7, 173.
Sharaf, A., El-Gharbawy, A., & Ragheb, M. A. (2018). Factors that influence entrepreneurial intention within University students in Egypt. Oalib, 05(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104881
Shen, T., Osorio, A. E., & Settles, A. (2017). Does family support matter? The influence of support factors on entrepreneurial attitudes and intentions of college students. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 23(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.10901abstract
Shirokova, G., Bogatyreva, K., Beliaeva, T., & Puffer, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in different environmental settings. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23(3), 703–727. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsbed-09-2015-0132
Sieger, P., & Minola, T. (2017). The family’s financial support as a “Poisoned Gift”: A family embeddedness perspective on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(00), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12273
Siregar, S. A. A., & Marwan. (2020). The effect of parents socioeconomic status. Adversity Quotient, and Self-Efficacy, on Students’ Entrepreneurship Interest., 124, 582–589. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200305.122
Solesvik, M. Z. (2013). Entrepreneurial motivations and intentions: Investigating the role of education major. Education and Training, 55(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911311309314
Soomro, M. A., Memon, M. S., & Bukhari, N. S. (2019). Entrepreneurial education and its impact on entrepreneurial intentions: A comparative analysis of business graduates of public and private Universities of Sindh. Pacific Business Review International, 12(6), 35–46.
Trivedi, R. (2016). Does university play significant role in shaping entrepreneurial intention? A cross-country comparative analysis. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development., 23(3), 23.
Tsai, K. H., Chang, H. C., & Peng, C. Y. (2016). Extending the link between entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention: A moderated mediation model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0351-2
Turker, D., & Selcuk, S. S. (2009). Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students? Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(2), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590910939049
Ventura, R., & Quero, M. J. (2013). Using Facebook in University teaching: a practical case study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83(2008), 1032–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.192
Wang, J., Zhang, Y., & Goh, M. (2018). Moderating the role of firm size in sustainable performance improvement through sustainable supply chain management. Sustainability (switzerland), 10(5), 1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051654
Wang, L., Ying, G. G., Zhao, J. L., Yang, X. B., Chen, F., Tao, R., Liu, S., & Zhou, L. J. (2010). Occurrence and risk assessment of acidic pharmaceuticals in the Yellow River, Hai River and Liao River of north China. Science of the Total Environment, 408(16), 3139–3147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.04.047
Wirtschaft, Z. B. W. L. (2018). Influence of motivation and self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intention to run a business. Expert Journal of Marketing, 6(1), 14–21. http://hdl.handle.net/11159/4490%0AKontakt/Contact.
Xu, F., Kellermanns, F. W., Jin, L., & Xi, J. (2020). Family support as social exchange in entrepreneurship: Its moderating impact on entrepreneurial stressors-well-being relationships. Journal of Business Research, 120(August), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.033
Yang, X., Zhang, M., Kong, L., Wang, Q., & Hong, J. C. (2021). The effects of scientific self-efficacy and cognitive anxiety on science engagement with the “Question-Observation-Doing-Explanation” model during school disruption in COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(3), 380–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09877-x
Yurtkoru, E. S., & Seray, B. (2014). Willingness to take risk and entrepreneurial intention of University Students: An empirical study comparing private and state Universities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 834–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.092
Yusoff, A., Ahmad, N. H., & Halim, H. A. (2016). Tailoring future agropreneurs: The impact of academic institutional variables on entrepreneurial drive and intentions. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 19(2), 156–182.
Zainon, C. M., Bin Yusoff, M. N. H., Zainol, F. A., & Afthanorhan, A. (2020). Risk-taking propensity & personality of women entrepreneurs in Malaysia. Journal of Critical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.06.217
Zellweger, T., Sieger, P., & Halter, F. (2011). Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.04.001
Zhang, Y., Duysters, G., & Cloodt, M. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students’ entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(3), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0246-z
The researchers acknowledge all the parties involved in the study, including the Beijing University of Technology, for its permission to conduct the study. Authors also acknowledge the source of primary data for availing their data open access. We thank Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa for providing funding for this study.
This research was supported by Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Beijing University of Technology, China.
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Martins, J.M., Shahzad, M.F. & Xu, S. Factors influencing entrepreneurial intention to initiate new ventures: evidence from university students. J Innov Entrep 12, 63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00333-9